Alternatives/Granola·Meeting notes

Best Granola Alternatives in 2026

Granola is bot-free — but its audio is transcribed in the cloud. Seven alternatives compared on where the audio actually goes, whether they tell speakers apart, and what the caps and prices are.

Download LUCI, freeLUCI vs Granola →
CategoryMeeting notes
Tools compared7
Platforms coveredMac · Windows · Linux
01 — Context

Why people look for a Granola alternative

Granola earned its position. It made bot-free capture normal, the notes are clean, the templates are good, and after a March 2026 Series C ($125M at a $1.5B valuation) it is pushing from notetaker toward an enterprise "context layer". Most people who leave are not leaving because it is bad at meeting notes.

They leave for one of three reasons, and it is worth knowing which is yours. The first is privacy fine print: per Granola's own transcription documentation, audio is passed from your microphone and system audio to a cloud transcription provider, transcripts are stored on US-hosted AWS, non-Enterprise accounts train its models on anonymized data unless you opt out, and it cannot sign BAAs. Bot-free is not the same as local, and if you chose it for confidentiality that is the paragraph to read.

The second is speaker identification. Granola's desktop app has no live diarization — speech is labelled "Me" or "Them", with real speaker ID limited to in-person meetings on iPhone. For multi-party calls where who said what is the point, that is a hard limit rather than a rough edge.

The third is scope. Granola stops at the meeting. If most of your context lives in the PR you reviewed, the deck you were shown, or the thread you read, a meetings-only tool will never see it.

02 — Criteria

What to compare, beyond "does it use a bot"

Bot-free is table stakes in 2026 — half this list qualifies. These are the axes that actually separate them.

Q1

Where the audio is transcribed

Bot-free describes what your meeting guests see. It says nothing about where the audio goes afterwards. Jamie processes in Frankfurt and via the OpenAI API; Granola sends audio to a cloud transcription provider and stores transcripts on US-hosted AWS; LUCI, Meetily, and anarlog (formerly Hyprnote) transcribe on your machine. Same guest experience, completely different data path.

Q2

Speaker identification on desktop

Diarization is where bot-free tools quietly differ, because capturing from your own machine makes separating voices harder than a bot with per-participant streams. Check it specifically on desktop — several tools do it on mobile only.

Q3

Caps you will actually hit

Free and mid tiers are shaped by meeting-length and history limits more than feature lists: Jamie caps free meetings at 30 minutes and Pro at 3 hours; Otter's free tier is 300 minutes a month with a 30-minute ceiling per conversation; Fireflies caps recording length by tier. Compare the ceiling, not the headline price.

Q4

Whether the notes stay stranded

A recap in a doc is a dead end. The useful question is whether the meeting joins something you can question later — across calls — and whether your AI tools can reach it over MCP without you copying anything.

03 — Side by side

Granola alternatives compared

Capture behaviour, caps, and pricing reflect each vendor's own documentation and pricing pages as of July 2026. Litigation described in this table is alleged and undecided.

ToolCaptureProcessingPlatformsPriceBest for
LUCIOur pickBot-free, meetings + screenOn-device, encrypted at restMac & WindowsFree (sessions up to 4 h)Best for bot-free notes that stay on your device — inside a memory of your whole day
MeetilyBot-free, audio onlyOn-device (local Whisper / Parakeet)Mac & Windows (Linux in development)Free (MIT); Pro $10/user/moBest for open-source purists who want auditable local meeting notes
anarlog (formerly Hyprnote)RebrandedBot-free, audio onlyOn-device STTMac (Apple Silicon) promoted; Windows partialFree with your own API keys; Pro $15/moBest for Mac users who want local notes as plain Markdown files they own
JamieBot-free, audio onlyCloud — Frankfurt servers + OpenAI APIDesktop + iOS/AndroidFree (10 mtgs/mo, 30 min); Pro €39/moBest for EU teams who want bot-free notes with data residency in Germany
OtterOtterPilot bot joins the callCloud (AWS S3)Web, desktop, mobileFree (300 min/mo); Pro ~$8.33–$16.99Best for teams who want mature admin tooling and do not mind a visible bot
Fireflies"Fred" bot, always visible in the callCloudWeb + integrationsFree; $10–$39/user/mo (annual)Best for sales teams who want CRM automation and treat the bot as a feature
TwinMindBot-free, always-on ambient listeningPartly cloud — flagship Ear-3 model is cloud-basediOS/Android strong; Windows waitlist onlyFree; Pro $15/mo; Max $30/moBest for capturing in-person conversations on your phone all day
04 — In detail

Every option, in detail

LUCI

Our pick

Best for bot-free notes that stay on your device — inside a memory of your whole day

Capture
Bot-free, meetings + screen
Processing
On-device, encrypted at rest
Platforms
Mac & Windows
Price
Free (sessions up to 4 h)
Maintenance
Actively developed and shipping; your memory lives on your own disk

LUCI keeps the part of Granola people came for — no bot joins the call — and closes the two gaps. Transcription, note generation, and storage all happen on-device and encrypted, so there is no transcription provider in the path and no US-cloud copy of a client conversation. It works with Wi-Fi off, which is the test that settles the question.

It also diarizes on-device, so multi-party calls are answerable by speaker, and it captures your screen alongside meetings — the deck you were shown, the PR you reviewed — into one memory you can question across calls. The Agent Bridge then opens that memory to the agents you already use — Claude, Cursor, and Codex — with nothing to set up.

LUCI vs GranolaAI meeting notes

Meetily

Best for open-source purists who want auditable local meeting notes

Capture
Bot-free, audio only
Processing
On-device (local Whisper / Parakeet)
Platforms
Mac & Windows (Linux in development)
Price
Free (MIT); Pro $10/user/mo

Meetily is bot-free and transcribes locally with Whisper- or Parakeet-class models, under an MIT licence, with a free and uncapped community edition. If your requirement is that you can read the code that handles your audio, this is the shortest path.

It is deliberately narrow: meeting audio only, per-meeting notes rather than memory that accumulates across calls, no screen capture, and no MCP interface. Mac and Windows have installers; Linux and self-hosting mean building from source.

LUCI vs MeetilyMeetily alternatives

anarlog (formerly Hyprnote)

Rebranded

Best for Mac users who want local notes as plain Markdown files they own

Capture
Bot-free, audio only
Processing
On-device STT
Platforms
Mac (Apple Silicon) promoted; Windows partial
Price
Free with your own API keys; Pro $15/mo

Local transcription, bot-free capture, and notes as searchable Markdown on disk — a good fit if you want your meeting record to be ordinary files rather than rows in someone's database. Open source under MIT.

Two things to weigh. The brand split in 2026: the open-source project was renamed anarlog while hyprnote.com became char.com, a cloud app from the same team — worth understanding which you are installing. And summaries need either your own API key or an on-device model unless you are on the hosted Pro tier.

LUCI vs Hyprnote

Jamie

Best for EU teams who want bot-free notes with data residency in Germany

Capture
Bot-free, audio only
Processing
Cloud — Frankfurt servers + OpenAI API
Platforms
Desktop + iOS/Android
Price
Free (10 mtgs/mo, 30 min); Pro €39/mo

Jamie is the strongest option if your constraint is European data residency rather than on-device processing: bot-free capture, servers in Frankfurt, and proper mobile apps, which several local-first tools lack entirely.

It is still cloud. Audio is processed off your machine, partly via the OpenAI API, transcripts are retained on the EU server, and it needs a connection to work. Notes arrive after processing rather than live, and meetings are capped — 30 minutes on free, 2 hours on Plus, 3 hours on Pro.

LUCI vs Jamie

Otter

Best for teams who want mature admin tooling and do not mind a visible bot

Capture
OtterPilot bot joins the call
Processing
Cloud (AWS S3)
Platforms
Web, desktop, mobile
Price
Free (300 min/mo); Pro ~$8.33–$16.99

Moving from Granola to Otter is a step back on the thing Granola got right — OtterPilot joins the call as a participant and posts transcript links into the chat — but a step forward on maturity: broad integrations, enterprise admin tooling, and years of transcription tuning.

The fine print: conversations are stored in Otter's cloud on AWS, the free tier caps you at 300 minutes a month with a 30-minute ceiling per conversation, roughly six transcription languages are supported (one per session), and a HIPAA BAA is Enterprise-only. A pending federal class action alleges Otter recorded participants who never consented; Otter denies the claims and there has been no ruling.

LUCI vs OtterOtter alternatives

Fireflies

Best for sales teams who want CRM automation and treat the bot as a feature

Capture
"Fred" bot, always visible in the call
Processing
Cloud
Platforms
Web + integrations
Price
Free; $10–$39/user/mo (annual)

Fireflies is built for revenue teams: deep CRM workflows, 100+ transcription languages, and automation around the transcript. For some teams the visible bot is desirable — it makes recording explicit to everyone in the room.

It is the opposite of Granola's design on the axis you probably came here for. The Fred bot is always present in the participant list, it is blockable by Zoom admin blocklists — with Teams auto-blocking notetaker bots from August 2026 — recording length and storage are capped by tier, and a BAA is Enterprise-only. A pending BIPA class action alleges voiceprints were collected from non-consenting participants; the claims are unproven.

LUCI vs Fireflies

TwinMind

Best for capturing in-person conversations on your phone all day

Capture
Bot-free, always-on ambient listening
Processing
Partly cloud — flagship Ear-3 model is cloud-based
Platforms
iOS/Android strong; Windows waitlist only
Price
Free; Pro $15/mo; Max $30/mo

TwinMind is the best option here if your meetings are not on a screen. It is mobile-first and designed for always-on ambient capture, with speaker ID on paid tiers — the in-person case Granola largely leaves alone.

For desktop work it fits poorly. The flagship Ear-3 model is cloud-based, Pro routes through ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, the Windows app is waitlist-only, and the always-on design is the opposite of deliberate capture if consent is a concern.

LUCI vs TwinMind
05 — Decision

Which one, given why you are leaving

You want bot-free notes but the audio must stay on your own device

LUCI

You need to read the code that handles your audio

Meetily

Your constraint is EU data residency, not on-device processing

Jamie

You need multi-party speaker ID on desktop calls

LUCI (on-device diarization)

You want CRM automation and the bot is fine

Fireflies

Most of your conversations happen in person, on your phone

TwinMind

06 — FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Granola private? It does not use a bot.

Bot-free describes what your guests see, not where the data goes. Per Granola's own transcription documentation, audio from your microphone and system audio is passed to a cloud transcription provider and transcripts are stored on US-hosted AWS; non-Enterprise accounts train its models on anonymized data unless you opt out, and it states it cannot sign BAAs. That may be fine for internal meetings and a problem for privileged client conversations.

Which Granola alternatives process everything on-device?

LUCI, Meetily, and anarlog (formerly Hyprnote) transcribe locally. LUCI additionally captures screen activity and exposes the memory to AI agents over MCP; Meetily and anarlog are meeting-audio only. Jamie is bot-free but cloud-processed in Frankfurt, and Otter and Fireflies are cloud with a bot in the call.

Does any bot-free notetaker do speaker identification on desktop?

Yes — LUCI diarizes on-device on Mac and Windows. This is a real differentiator: Granola's desktop app labels speech only as "Me" or "Them" per its docs, with speaker ID limited to in-person meetings on iPhone, and TwinMind's speaker ID is on paid tiers with cloud models.

Is there a free Granola alternative?

LUCI is free with no monthly meeting quota or history cap and runs entirely on-device, with sessions of up to four hours. Meetily's community edition is free and uncapped under MIT. Jamie's free tier allows 10 meetings a month at 30 minutes each, and Otter's allows 300 minutes a month with a 30-minute ceiling per conversation.

Can I export my Granola notes before switching?

Yes — export your notes from Granola first, then check whether your chosen replacement supports importing them; LUCI can take exported transcripts and notes in as searchable memory. Do the export before cancelling, since free tiers typically keep only a limited note history.

Will switching mean a bot starts joining my calls?

Only if you pick a bot-based tool. LUCI, Meetily, anarlog, Jamie, and TwinMind all capture without adding a participant. Otter and Fireflies put a visible bot in the call — which also means they can be blocked by host IT policies, with Microsoft Teams auto-blocking notetaker bots from August 2026.

LUCI vs GranolaGranola is bot-free. It is not local.Is Granola local?What is speaker diarization?No-bot AI notetakerBot-free vs local vs cloudAI meeting notesAll comparisons
Switching from Granola?

Meetings and screen, remembered on your own machine.

Free on Mac and Windows. No bot in the call. Your agents can read it.

Download LUCI, freeSee the 1:1