LUCI records, transcribes, and remembers client meetings entirely on your own Mac or Windows machine. No bot joins the call, no cloud vendor receives the conversation, nothing trains anyone's models. The confidentiality analysis gets short because the data stays on your own machine, encrypted at rest.
Model Rule 1.6 doesn't just prohibit revealing client information — it requires "reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to" it. Run a client call through a cloud notetaker and you have handed the conversation to a vendor: it is processed on their servers, retained under their policy, accessible under their terms of service, and — for some tools — used to improve their models. Ethics guidance has caught up fast. ABA Formal Opinion 512 (2024) requires lawyers to understand a generative AI tool's data practices before use, and demands informed client consent — not boilerplate — before confidential information goes into self-learning tools. The NYC Bar's Opinion 2025-6 applies the same discipline to AI recording and transcription specifically.
The privilege question is sharper still. Disclosure to a third party is the classic way privilege gets waived, and firms including White & Case have published analyses warning that putting privileged communications into third-party AI systems creates genuine waiver risk. No court has definitively ruled on cloud notetakers yet — which cuts both ways: nobody can promise you it's fine, and the cautious posture is to keep privileged conversations out of third-party clouds entirely.
LUCI's answer is architectural. Capture, transcription, summarization, and search all run on your own machine; recordings and transcripts are stored in an encrypted local database. There is no vendor processing step — so the third-party analysis, the training-data worry, and the retention-policy negotiation mostly disappear. What remains is what should remain: your professional judgment and your client's informed consent.
Cloud notetakers interpose a vendor — their servers, their staff, their retention policy — into attorney-client communications. Firms like White & Case and Smith Anderson have published warnings about exactly this pattern. LUCI transcribes on your own machine: there is no vendor to receive the communication in the first place.
Where is client data stored? On your encrypted local disk. Who can access it? You. Is it used to train models? No — it is stored on the device, encrypted at rest. Retention and deletion? Your file system, your rules. The due-diligence questions ABA Formal Opinion 512 requires you to ask of AI vendors mostly stop applying when there is no vendor processing.
A visible notetaker bot in a negotiation or client call invites objections and awkward consent theater — and many organizations now block bot participants outright. LUCI records on your own machine with nothing joining the call. You still disclose and get consent; you just don't need anyone to admit a robot.
LUCI links client meetings with the documents and research on your screen into one locally searchable memory. 'What did the client say about the earn-out across our last three calls?' returns a cited answer — without any of it touching a cloud.
Client intake and counseling. Record the conversation with the client's informed consent. LUCI produces a transcript and summary on your machine before you're back at your desk — no vendor saw a word of it.
Depositions prep and matter review. LUCI's screen memory indexes the documents you worked through — locally — so "which exhibit had the revised payment schedule?" is a search, not an afternoon.
Negotiations. No bot appears in the participant list, so there's nothing for opposing counsel to object to or for a client's IT to block. Disclosure stays a professional conversation you control.
Follow-through. LUCI's agent drafts the follow-up email and the action list from the meeting — with every claim linked to a timestamp you can verify before anything leaves your outbox.
Get informed consent before recording client conversations — the NYC Bar's Opinion 2025-6 says so explicitly, roughly a dozen states require all-party consent to record, and it's good practice everywhere. LUCI doesn't change your professional obligations; it changes the risk surface after you've met them. This page is product information, not legal ethics advice — consult your jurisdiction's rules.
It's a documented risk that ethics bodies and major firms are actively warning about. When a cloud notetaker transcribes a client conversation, a third-party vendor receives, processes, and often retains the privileged communication — the classic third-party-disclosure pattern that can threaten privilege. Courts haven't definitively ruled on cloud notetakers yet, which is exactly why cautious firms treat it as a risk to avoid rather than a bet to make. An on-device tool like LUCI removes the third party from the conversation entirely.
ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) says lawyers must understand how a generative AI tool handles data and safeguard client information under Rule 1.6 before using it. For self-learning tools — ones that train on inputs — it requires informed client consent before entering confidential information, and states that boilerplate engagement-letter language isn't sufficient. LUCI sidesteps most of that analysis: nothing you record is sent to a vendor or used to train anyone's models — it stays encrypted on your own machine.
Yes. The NYC Bar's Formal Opinion 2025-6 advises obtaining informed client consent before using AI tools to record or transcribe client conversations, and recording-consent statutes apply regardless of technology — roughly a dozen US states require all parties to consent. LUCI changes what happens after consent: the recording stays on your device under your control, instead of on a vendor's servers under their terms.
Three ways. No bot: nothing joins the call for opposing counsel or clients to object to. No cloud: Otter and Fireflies process and store conversations on their servers — each currently faces a class action, one alleging recording of non-consenting participants and one alleging biometric voiceprints of them (both companies deny the claims; no rulings) — while LUCI processes everything on your machine. No training exposure: your matters never become anyone's model inputs.
Yes — that's the part meeting-only tools miss. LUCI's screen memory locally indexes what you reviewed — filings, contracts, research — alongside client calls, so you can ask 'what did we discuss about the indemnification clause, and which draft was on screen?' and get a cited answer. All of it stays on your device.
LUCI keeps every recording, transcript, and note on your own machine.
100% free. Mac & Windows. No vendor in the middle.